Memorizing these 090-554 test questions is sufficient to pass the exam.

We are doing an extraordinary battle to offer you genuine SCO OPENSERVER(TM) RELEASE 5 NETWORK ADMINISTRATION V30A1 test questions and responses, alongside clarifications. Each 090-554 free pdf download on has been checked and approved by our 090-554 specialists. They are qualified and confirmed individuals, who have a seriously long encounter seen with the SCO certificates. They really look at the 090-554 exam questions according to practice test.

Home > Practice Tests > 090-554



Pass4sure 090-554 dumps real question bank
Exam Code: 090-554 SCO OPENSERVER(TM) RELEASE 5 NETWORK ADMINISTRATION V30A1 Exam plan January 2024 by team

Other SCO exams

090-600 SCO OpenServer Release 6 System Administration
090-602 SCO OpenServer Release 6 Master Advanced Certified Engineer

We provide valid 090-554 090-554 dumps that contains actual Questions and Answers required for Passing 090-554 test. We truly enable individuals to enhance their knowledge to answer all 090-554 questions in the exam and pass with high marks. Now you need not to waste much of your time on internet for dumps.
Question: 50
Which file is used to configure SCO PPP connections?
A. /etc/pppattach
B. /etc/ppp
C. /etc/ppphosts
D. /etc/tcp
Answer: C
Question: 51
Which file does the inetd daemon read to determine which services to provide?
A. /etc/inetd.conf
B. /etc/rc.inet
C. /etc/hosts
D. /etc/tcp
Answer: A
Question: 52
Which DNS record type is used to record an alias for a hostname?
B. A
Answer: A
Question: 53
Which condition prevents FTP access to a user account?
A. The user has a non-null password.
B. The users name is listed in the /etc/ftpusers file.
C. The users shell is listed in the /etc/shells file.
D. The users name is listed in the /etc/ftpaccess file.
Answer: B
Question: 54
Which packets can a packet filter restrict?
A. Incoming packets only
B. Outgoing packets only
C. Either incoming or outgoing packets
D. A packet filter must restrict both incoming and outgoing packets.
Answer: C
Question: 55
Which statement about the VisionFS Profile Editor is TRUE?
A. The VisionFS Profile Editor is executed on the SCO OpenServer system under X
B. The VisionFS Profile Editor is a Microsoft Windows application.
C. TermLite is used to access the VisionFS Profile Editor from Microsoft Windows.
D. XVision must be used to access the VisionFS Profile Editor.
Answer: B
Question: 56
Which mail channel protocol is used by SCO OpenServer to transmit outgoing e-mail
over a TCP/IP network?
Answer: C
Question: 57
Which method CANNOT display a GUI interface for configuring the Netscape web
servers on the SCO OpenServer system called webserver?
A. Enter the SCO OpenServer /usr/internet/ns_httpd/start-admin command
B. Select Netscape Server Admin from SCOadmin
C. From the system webserver, run Netscape Navigator, and go to the URL
D. From an authorized system on your network, run a web browser, and go to the URL
Answer: A
For More exams visit
Kill your exam at First Attempt....Guaranteed!

SCO OPENSERVER(TM) Exam plan - BingNews Search results SCO OPENSERVER(TM) Exam plan - BingNews SCO Goes To Bat With OpenServer 6

Unveiled in a product launch at Yankee Stadium, OpenServer 6 integrates the System V Release 5 Unix kernel of SCO UnixWare 7.0 with the Web-based OpenServer platform. The upgraded server lets ISVs and customers develop Java, Unix and Web applications for Advanced Micro Devices and Intel platforms on a single SCO code base, according to SCO, Lindon, Utah.

Hewlett-Packard said it plans to offer a portfolio of SCO OpenServer 6 certifications for its ProLiant server platforms. The enhancements will increase speed and performance of applications on OpenServer, which allows customers to manage e-mail, collaboration, backup, mobile support and Internet access on low-cost commodity hardware, SCO said.

"The performance advantages of the Release 5 kernel will support the advanced features of various languages and database products," said David Westrheim, CEO of IntelliNet, a Vancouver, British Columbia-based SCO partner. "We anticipate a strong upgrade flow from our client base."

OpenServer 6 offers up to two to four times the performance of the previous version and provides support for up to 32 processors and disk and network file sizes of up to 1 Tbyte. It also brings increased memory support for 64-bit database applications and multithreading support for C, C++ and Java applications through a POSIX interface.

Westrheim said customers and partners won't be disappointed. "It is not only stable but lightning fast. OpenServer 6 is a great technology upgrade for us and our clients because it provides the Unix Release V kernel with the administrative and user interface of OpenServer, a strong preference of many of our clients over Linux and other pure Unix derivatives."

Several SCO partners said they plan to migrate clients to OpenServer 6. "I expect an influx of new business to OpenServer 6 because it's so easy to port new applications to," said Deepak Thadani, president of SysIntegrators, Woodside, N.Y.

Fri, 22 Dec 2023 11:34:00 -0600 text/html
SCO Makes Its Pitch With OpenServer 6

Making its debut in a product launch at Yankee Stadium, OpenServer 6--code-named Project Legend--integrates the System V Release 5 Unix kernel of SCO UnixWare 7.0 with the Web-based OpenServer platform. The upgraded server allows ISVs and customers to develop Unix, Web and Java applications for Intel and AMD platforms on a single SCO code base, according to SCO.

Hewlett-Packard said it plans to offer a portfolio of SCO OpenServer 6 certifications for its ProLiant server platforms. The enhancements will increase speed and performance of applications on OpenServer, which allows customers to manage e-mail, collaboration, backup, mobile support and Internet access on low-cost commodity hardware, SCO said.

"The performance advantages of the Release 5 kernel will support the advanced features of various languages and database products," said David Westrheim, CEO of IntelliNet, a Vancouver, British Columbia-based SCO partner. "We anticipate a strong upgrade flow from our client base."

The upgrade offers up to two to four times the performance of the previous version and provides support for up to 32 processors, disk and network file sizes of up to 1 terabyte. It also brings increased memory support for 64-bit database applications and, through the inclusion of Unix System V release 5, multithreading support for C, C++ and Java applications through a POSIX interface. Major security enhancements include SSH support for secure remote login, an IP firewall filter for handling IP traffic and IPsec for secure virtual private networking.

OpenServer 6, however, doesn't include the full SCOx Web services platform, as was originally planned. Instead, SCO integrated Web services technology from SCOx that will allow customers to bring data from "green screen" mainframe environments into OpenServer 6. The upgrade offers the latest versions of Java 1.4.2 and popular open-source projects such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, the Apache Web server, the Tomcat Java Servelet, the Mozilla browser and the Samba file/print server. Customers can use the OpenServer desktop interface or the included KDE-based environment.

In the background of the OpenServer 6 launch, Lindon, Utah-based SCO remains embroiled in bitter lP litigation with IBM, Novell and Red Hat over the alleged use of System V Unix code in the Linux kernel, among other copyright issues. In the three years since SCO filed its case against IBM, some SCO partners and customers defected because they wanted to migrate to Linux or feared that SCO would lose its intellectual property battle and go out of business.

Still, loyal SCO partners said customers are ignoring the legal proceedings, and now solution providers hope that the software vendor can hit a home run with OpenServer 6.

Several SCO partners said they soon plan to migrate customers to OpenServer 6. Both the $599 standard edition and $1,399 enterprise edition are being released this week.

Michael Brown, president of The Kingsway Group, a solution provider and an SCO reseller based in Thornhill, Ontario, said his customers have started asking about OpenServer 6. "They want to ensure that it will be as rock-solid and bug-free as OpenServer Release 5, which will be a tough act to follow," he said. "We have already quoted OpenServer Release 6 to one location and will likely start migrating those customers, if it makes sense for them, after a few weeks."

Brown said that this weekend he plans to attend a "Test Fest" for partners sponsored by SCO, HP and iXorg in which OpenServer 6 will be put through the paces on new hardware, older servers and white boxes.

IntelliNet's Westrheim said he has been beta-testing OpenServer 6 and maintains that partners and customers won't be disappointed. "It is not only stable but lightning fast," he said. "OpenServer 6 is a great technology upgrade for us and our clients because it provides the Unix Release V kernel with the administrative and user interface of OpenServer, a strong preference of many of our clients over Linux and other pure Unix derivatives. "

Of the original raft of top Unix operating-system vendors, only Sun Microsystems and SCO have shown a commitment to enhance Unix over the long term. HP and IBM support their Unix offerings but have stated that they will focus on supporting Linux as their future platform of choice.

Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:35:00 -0600 text/html
Proficiency Exam Information

If you are interested in taking any proficiency exams before classes start, please see the information below on how to register for the available exams. These are all optional exams. We recommend discussing the implications for your spring schedule with your four-year advisor.

  • Friday, Jan. 12
    • 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. ENGR 131 Computer Science Proficiency Exam 
      • If you are interested in taking the proficiency exam for the ENGR 131 course (MATLAB), plan to attend this exam session. If you have questions, please email Matthew Williams at
    • 1 to 4 p.m. Math Proficiency Exam 
  • Saturday, Jan. 13
    • 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. Physics Proficiency Exam
    • 2 to 4 p.m. Chemistry Proficiency Exam
      • If you are interested in taking the Chemistry Proficiency Exam, plan to attend this exam session. If you have questions, please email Drew Meyer at
  • Sunday, Jan. 14
    • 1 to 4 p.m. CSDS 132 Computer Science Proficiency Exam 
      • If you are interested in taking the proficiency exam for the CSDS 132 course (Java), plan to attend this exam session. If you have questions, please email Harold Connamacher at
Tue, 14 Nov 2023 10:00:00 -0600 en text/html
How to plan effectively

Everyone is unique so during exam season make sure you explore different methods to find what works for you. 

Darren Adeboyejo, Computer Science BSc (Hons) student says:

“Practice as much as possible - testing your knowledge using past papers and other online resources helps to improve your information recall and allows you to prioritise your revision by identifying your weakest subject areas.”

Try to start as soon as possible and review your notes regularly before making a solid plan. If you feel like you have left it too late, not to worry.

Ammaara, who studies Education Studies with Psychology BA (Hons) shares some useful advice to guide you through your journey

Time management tips by Rebekah Savil, Psychology BSc (Hons) student::

  1. Make your revision plan simple and achievable.
  2. Prioritise – which subject needs the most attention? Start with the subjects you feel are your weakest areas.
  3. Try to do an hour revision for each subject a week - this makes revision simple and regular.
  4. Add your exams into your calendar and set countdown reminders in the week running up to each exam date.
  5. Use any free days effectively. Wake up on time, study in the morning then treat yourself to a favourite lunch and maybe study for little longer! You will feel less stressed if you have been proactive.
  6. Remember to take breaks when revising - go for a walk, have some healthy snacks or do some simple stretches; you'll feel refreshed and be more focused and ready to study.

Plan ahead of the big day


It’s also very important to plan ahead and think about the day of the exam, simple things like packing enough stationery e.g. a calculator or a pencil. Spend some time the day before packing what you’ll need and making sure you check times and venue details so you’re ready to go on the day.

Here are some things to think about:

  1. You must bring your own pens, pencils, eraser and spares—invigilators cannot loan stationery to you.
  2. Phones, smart watches, fitness trackers, MP3 players and any data storage device: none of these are to be on you during the exam. 
  3. Ear/headphones of any description are not allowed.
  4. Drinks - you can bring a drink in a clear plastic container with all labels removed.

Bring your student ID card which should be clear and the photo not defaced – if for any reason you’ve lost it, don’t panic, bring some form of ID and notify your teachers ASAP.

Go to the next section

Sat, 21 Mar 2020 21:59:00 -0500 en-GB text/html
Installing Linux Like It’s 1989

A common example of the sheer amount of computing power available to almost anyone today is comparing a smartphone to the Apollo guidance computer. This classic computer was the first to use integrated circuits so it’s fairly obvious that most modern technology would be orders of magnitude more powerful, but we don’t need to go back to the 1960s to see this disparity. Simply going back to 1989 and getting a Compaq laptop from that era running again, while using a Raspberry Pi Zero to help it along, illustrates this point well enough.

[befinitiv] was able to get a Raspberry Pi installed inside of the original computer case, and didn’t simply connect the original keyboard and display and then call it a completed build. The original 286 processor is connected to the Pi with a serial link, so both devices can communicate with each other. Booting up the computer into DOS and running a small piece of software allows the computer into a Linux terminal emulator hosted on the Raspberry Pi. The terminal can be exited and the computer will return back to its original DOS setup. This also helps to bypass the floppy disk drive for transferring files to the 286 as well, since files can be retrieved wirelessly on the Pi and then sent to the 286.

This is quite an interesting mashup of new and old technology, and with the Pi being around two orders of magnitude more powerful than the 286 and wedged into vacant space inside the original case, [befinitiv] points out that this amalgamation of computers is “borderline useful”. It’s certainly an upgrade for the Compaq, and for others attempting to get ancient hardware on the internet, don’t forget that you can always use hardware like this to access Hackaday’s retro site.

Wed, 30 Jun 2021 04:06:00 -0500 Bryan Cockfield en-US text/html
Scottish pupils could face 'treadmill' of tests in exam plan

School pupils could face a "treadmill" of exam-like tests in case the 2021-22 diet is cancelled, teachers have said.

General secretary of the EIS union, Larry Flannagan, said the contingency plan would involve teachers collecting evidence as well as preparing for exams which risked a "dual system".

He said a letter from the SQA suggested that assessments throughout the year would be "qualification-level".

Scotland's education secretary said the plan was "fair and credible".

Formal exams have been cancelled for the past two years because of the pandemic - but there has been criticism about the way grades were decided.

Senior pupils complained that assessments which replaced exams were just "exams by another name", after some had to do the tests under similar conditions - but with much less preparation.

'Code for 'qualification-level''

On Wednesday it was announced that National 5, Higher and Advanced Higher exams would go ahead next year if it is deemed safe for them to do so.

If there is further disruption to learning but exams can still go ahead, the Scottish government said there would be modifications to courses and assessments.

If exams cannot take place, the contingency is that awards will be made on teachers' judgements based on normal in-year assessment.

However Mr Flanagan told the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme that the SQA had suggested those tests would not be based on pupil progress - and instead would be more like sitting an actual exam.

He said: "I have some concerns about the SQA letter which was published yesterday which suggests teachers could be collecting evidence across the year whilst also preparing for exams. That to us runs the risk of a dual system and that creates an assessment treadmill for pupils.

"You do have classroom assessment in order to feedback to pupils but what the SQA said was the nature of those assessment should be rigorous - and what they really mean by that is a code for qualification-level.

"There are two types of assessment - the normal everyday around progress and the summative; where are you in terms of your ability to pass an exam. What we don't want is what we had last year which is SQA-driven assessments being scheduled across the whole year."

An announcement published by the SQA on Wednesday said that if exams were cancelled due to public health conditions, teachers and lecturers should "use their professional judgement of assessment evidence" to determine grades.

It said assessments should "provide an appropriate degree of challenge, integration and application of the key knowledge and skills of each national course".

'Open books'

Scotland's Education Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said what would be expected of pupils this year would be "different" to the last.

She said: "The work we've been doing over the summer with the national qualifications group - which includes the EIS, parents and young people's representatives - has allowed us to hear their views and to build an assessment package that is fair and credible on the assumption we will have exams if public health allows it to happen.

"What we've tried to do is ensure that we recognise that there is still a level of disruption, and taking into the account the pandemic is still with us.

"Of course we still have to make modifications. What we're reducing is the content of exams to make it more simple for teachers to guide students about what would happen.

"If we see additional disruption to what's happening there can perhaps be further modifications, for example more use of open books or an advance note of topic areas for revision purposes."

Copyright 2024 BBC. All rights reserved.  The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.

Beta Terms By using the Beta Site, you agree that such use is at your own risk and you know that the Beta Site may include known or unknown bugs or errors, that we have no obligation to make this Beta Site available with or without charge for any period of time, nor to make it available at all, and that nothing in these Beta Terms or your use of the Beta Site creates any employment relationship between you and us. The Beta Site is provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis and we make no warranty to you of any kind, express or implied.

In case of conflict between these Beta Terms and the BBC Terms of Use these Beta Terms shall prevail.

Thu, 19 Aug 2021 00:04:00 -0500 text/html Nearly 25% of Law Schools Plan to Use JD-Next Admission Test

Nearly 25% of American Bar Association-accredited law schools have been granted a variance from Standard 503 to use JD-Next as an admission test, which can be used in lieu of the Law School Admissions Test and the Graduate Record Exam.

In June, the Council of the American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions opened the door to allow schools to use the JD-Next exam, and in September granted variances to 32 law schools, plus the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law.

Fri, 08 Dec 2023 04:20:00 -0600 en text/html
Trump's Cognitive Exam; CDC Issues 'Urgent' Vaccination Alert; Plan B Use Doubled

Note that some links may require registration or subscription.

At a campaign event, former President Donald Trump said he "aced" his recent cognitive exam. (The Hill)

The cinnamon applesauce pouches linked to high lead levels in dozens of U.S. kids may have been intentionally contaminated, a top FDA official suggested. (Politico)

The CDC issued an "urgent" alert about the low vaccination rates for flu, COVID, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and called on healthcare providers to administer shots now to protect patients.

Meanwhile, AstraZeneca and Sanofi announced plans to ship another 230,000 doses of their monoclonal antibody for protecting infants from RSV to the U.S. market. (Reuters)

Healthcare companies are signing on to the U.S. plan to ensure the safe development of artificial intelligence in healthcare. (Reuters)

Hundreds of women have been denied emergency abortions in Texas since the state's near-total ban, a STAT analysis revealed.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) says he'll propose a plan to cut prescription drug costs by 50%. (Endpoints News)

A well-known fertility doctor and former Harvard Medical School professor used his own sperm to inseminate a patient in 1980, a new lawsuit alleges. (Washington Post)

Disgraced "Pharma Bro" Martin Shkreli asked an appeals court to overturn the ban from him working in the pharmaceutical industry. (Bloomberg)

The FDA warned multiple companies for selling unapproved antimicrobials for animals, saying that many of the treatments are used in humans and could contribute to antimicrobial resistance.

The World Health Organization is urging governments to ban all flavors of e-cigarettes. (Reuters)

Does that patient really have a penicillin allergy? (NBC News)

In order to succeed, HIV vaccine candidates may need to induce strong immune responses from CD8+ T cells, researchers reported in Science.

A New York doctor who appeared on the Bravo reality series "Below Deck" was charged in an alleged fake opioid prescription scheme that used the names of his fellow cast members. (AP)

CNN interviewed victims of the war in Gaza at a field hospital in Rafah.

The Smithsonian collected dozens of human brains from vulnerable individuals, many without consent, a Washington Post report revealed.

North Carolina is suing HCA Healthcare, alleging that it breached terms of the takeover agreement with Mission Health and has "degraded" care at the former nonprofit. (STAT)

A Texas man pleaded guilty to threatening to kill a Boston doctor who specializes in treating transgender youth. (NBC News)

Emergency contraception use among American women more than doubled since the morning-after pill was approved to be sold without a prescription (from 10.8% in 2006-2010 to 26.6% in 2015-2019), according to CDC data.

A Maine nurse was arrested for her alleged role in the January 6 Capitol riot, the FBI said. (WMTW)

Heart failure patients in lower socioeconomic neighborhoods were more likely to be non-adherent to guideline-recommended medication. (JAMA Network Open)

Here are NPR's top five 'viral' stories from the year.

Singer Patti Smith was discharged from a hospitalization in Italy following a "sudden illness." (People)

  • Kristen Monaco is a senior staff writer, focusing on endocrinology, psychiatry, and nephrology news. Based out of the New York City office, she’s worked at the company since 2015.

Thu, 14 Dec 2023 10:00:00 -0600 en text/html
Mathematics Graduate Program Information

Program-Specific Degree Requirements

Master's Programs: M.A. and M.S. Plan A and Plan B

The math department maintains 4 tracks by which students may obtain a Master of Arts (M.A.) or Master of Science (M.S.) degree in mathematics.

The following requirements are common to all four tracks:

  • The student must maintain a 3.0 cumulative GPA.

  • The student must complete 30 hours of formal mathematics coursework at the 5000 level.

  • As part of the 30 hours of formal 5000-level mathematics courses, the student must complete the following courses with a grade of B or better:

    • o MATH 5200: Real Variables I,

    • o MATH 5230: Complex Variables I,

    • o MATH 5310: Computational Methods I

    • o MATH 5400: Methods of Applied Mathematics I,

    • o MATH 5500: Advanced Linear Algebra, and

    • o MATH 5550: Abstract Algebra I.

  • The student must pass the department’s Foundation Exam. This exam covers material from advanced vector calculus and linear algebra at the upper-division undergraduate level and is offered before the beginning of each semester.

  • Take one hour of the seminar 4970: Professional Development in Mathematics and one hour of the seminar 4970: Professional Development in Teaching.

In addition to the common elements above, students must select and complete one of the capstone experiences described in the tracks below.

Track #1: Master's Thesis (Plan A)

Within the 30 hours of 5000-level courses, the Plan A student must complete 4 hours of MATH 5960: Thesis Research. At least 26 hours of 5000-level coursework must be math-content courses (not thesis research).

The student must prepare a master’s thesis (Plan A) and give an oral defense of the thesis. In the mathematics program, a Plan A thesis reports on the result(s) of independent and original research completed by the student under the direction of a faculty member. The thesis should describe the research and its results and be written to the standards of the appropriate area of mathematics.

Track #2: Master's Paper (Plan B)

The student must prepare a master’s paper (Plan B) and give an oral defense.

To write a Plan B paper, the student must present an expository paper on a designated mathematical subject. Students are guided by their advisor in the subject matter and in the preparation of the paper. A successful paper and defense demonstrates that the student has mastered a substantial mathematical topic that is beyond those covered in formal foundational coursework.

Track #3: Coursework/Project (Plan B)

A second M.A. or M.S. option exists for the Plan B student. In lieu of writing a paper, the student takes a sequence of three 5000-level courses that all address a common mathematical theme. The sequence must be approved by the student’s advisor and the mathematics graduate committee. Two of the courses must be mathematics-department offerings, and the third may be either a mathematics course (including reading/topics courses) or a course from another department in a related field.

  • The student must complete an additional 6 hours of courses at the 5000 level. Thus, Track #3 requires the completion of 36 hours of graduate-level coursework.

  • Within the 36 hours, the student must propose and complete with a grade of B or better an appropriate 3-course sequence

  • The student will write a short paper illustrating how the common mathematical theme of the sequence manifests itself in the content of each course and give a presentation/defense of the paper.

In approving the student’s proposal for this option, the graduate committee and the advisor will consider how the writing and independent study spirit of the Plan B option are fulfilled within the recommended plan.

Track #4: Qualifying Exam (Plan B)

A third M.A. or M.S. option exists for the Plan B student. In lieu of writing a paper or taking additional coursework, the student must take and pass the department’s PhD Qualifying Examination in one of the three areas: Analysis, Algebra, or Applied Mathematics. These examinations focus on the material in the required courses.

  • Pass one of the department’s qualifying exams in:

    • o Analysis (MATH 5200 and MATH 5230)

    • o Algebra (MATH 5500 and MATH 5550)

    • o Applied Mathematics (MATH 5310 and MATH 5400)

  • The oral component of this Track will consist of a defense of the student’s written answers to qualifying exam.

These examinations are given twice a year at the beginning of the fall and spring semesters.

**This option is intended for students who will continue for a PhD at UW.**

Doctoral Program

The student must maintain a 3.0 cumulative GPA.

The student must teach two semesters of college mathematics.

The student must complete a combination of 72 hours of coursework and dissertation research. Within the 72 hours, a maximum of 12 hours can be at the 4000 level, and 42 hours must be formal courses at the 5000 level. The courses must be mathematics courses or courses with significant mathematical content, as approved by the department's graduate committee.

Within the 42 hours of 5000-level courses, the student must:

  • Complete MATH 5200, 5230, 5310, 5400, 5500, and 5550 with a grade of B or better.

  • Take two hours of MATH 5800-02, Seminars and Colloquia.

  • Complete the courses distributed in three areas: algebra, analysis, and applied mathematics. The student must take at least two courses in each of two categories and at least one course from the third category. The department maintains a list of course categories.

In addition, the student must:

  • Pass the foundation exam, the qualifying exam in the student's research area, and the preliminary exam.

  • Write a dissertation containing the student's original mathematical results and present an oral defense of the research.

  • Take one hour of the seminar 4970: Professional Development in Mathematics and one hour of the seminar 4970: Professional Development in Teaching.

Mathematics (MATH) Courses

Apply to the Graduate Program

Sat, 30 Apr 2022 23:22:00 -0500 en text/html
Doctoral Programs

Doctor of Philosophy Programs

  • Doctor of Philosophy Program in Electrical Engineering (EE)
  • Doctor of Philosophy Program in Computer Engineering (CP)
Admission Requirements
Plan of Study
Program Duration
Transfer Credit
ECE Qualifier Exam
Candidacy Requirements
Academic Requirements


The primary goal of the Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering is to provide a research intensive program with the rigorous course work to strengthen the student's knowledge in the fundamentals of Electrical and Computer Engineering.  The programs include advanced graduate coursework in Electrical/Computer Engineering and allied subjects and research culminating in a doctoral dissertation.

A complete description of the doctoral programs are found in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Doctoral Student Handbook which is updated annually and available from the department office.

ADMISSIONAdmission Requirements

Applicants must have a BS or MS degree in Electrical Engineering or Computer Engineering or their equivalent from a recognized college or university with an acceptable quality of prior academic work. Applicants must submit official transcripts of all prior undergraduate and graduate courses. Each applicant must submit an official report of Graduate Record Examination (GRE) General Test scores. The TOEFL exam is required for students from abroad whose native language is not English.

PLANPlan of Study

Each student entering the program must develop a plan of study in consultation with his/her advisor.

Visit the ECE Graduate Website.

Transfer Credit

  1. A student with a master’s degree in Electrical Engineering / Computer Engineering or a closely related field may apply to have all coursework and thesis for the master's degree up to a total of 30 credits. Please consult with your PhD advisor and Associate Chair responsible for the Doctoral Programs (PhD program coordinator) and fill out the required petition form (link given below) for course transfer requests. This form is to be submitted to the Associate Chair for the Doctoral Programs for approval.  (
  2. A student with graduate-level course work earned (but not completed a degree program and graduated) at an accredited US or Canadian university may apply for transfer of up to 24 semester credits in acceptable graduate engineering courses (with grade of B or better) towards the doctoral program, upon approval by the Associate Chair responsible from the Doctoral Programs (PhD program coordinator).
  3. Students may be required to make up prerequisites which they lack in comparison to the equivalent Engineering curriculum at the University of Massachusetts Lowell.
  4. Course transfers are initially handled by the Graduate Program Coordinator (Associate Chair for the Doctoral Program). Course transfer will follow the steps below:

                           i.           Student’s previous institution must send student’s official transcript to UML Registrar through an email ( The official transcript should only be send by the previous institution directly to UML’s Registrar.

                           ii.           Course Transfer petition form filled out completely and signed/dated (student to submit to the Associate Chair for the Doctoral Program),

                          iii.           Unofficial transcript from the past institution that you are trying to transfer credit from (student to submit to the Associate Chair for the Doctoral Program),

                          iv.           Information on the accreditation (ABET or similar) for your department/institution (student to submit to the Associate Chair for the Doctoral Program),

                           v.           Course description, credit and course number for each course being intended to transfer (student to submit to the Associate Chair for the Doctoral Program).

                          vi.           Associate Chair for the Doctoral Program) will evaluate and approve the courses that can be transferred, and will make a request to the Associate Dean to do a final evaluation and approval. Dean’s office requests registrar to complete the course transfer process.

Course transfers are not allowed for the BS to PhD program. In other words, students who are admitted into our PhD program student directly after completing their BS degrees cannot transfer any MS/PhD level technical elective courses they have taken as part of their BS degree pathway or for their minor. However, those courses may be transferred into the MS program, if student choses to do MS first. 

ECE DEPARTMENT ece-department-qualifier-examQUALIFIER EXAM

The Qualifier Exam (QE) consists of three parts: i) course requirement; ii) oral presentation on a selected topic; and iii) written documentation on the same topic. Please see details below.

Qualifier Exam Committee

The QE Committee consists of three ECE faculty. One member is the faculty advisor. An additional member is selected by the student and the advisor. The 3rd member will be assigned by the ECE Qualifier Exam Sub-Committee (QESC**) and can be from ECE or non-ECE Dept. Selection of a non-ECE member shall be made only with the approval of the student’s advisor.  If the student of a QESC member will be taking the exam, he/she must recuse themselves from the QESC for their student’s exam. To allow sufficient time for the QESC to add the 3rd member, the ECE Request for Approval of PhD Qualifying Examination Committee form must be submitted to the graduate program coordinator at least one month prior to the anticipated QE date. The Chair of the committee can be either the advisor/student selected committee member or the third member, at the committee's discretion. A fourth member can be added at the discretion of the advisor. 

** The QESC will be comprised of 7 members: 6 elected plus the Doctoral coordinator. Yearly elections will be held for the 6 members from the ECE Faculty. 

Qualifier Exam Course Requirements

The student must complete two graduate ECE courses in their primary research area and one additional graduate ECE core course by the term the QE is scheduled. One of the three required courses may be taken during the semester when the QE is administered. The student must receive an average GPA of at least 3.300 for these courses. 

Failure to do so will be considered a failed attempt.

Qualifier Exam Policies and Procedures:

• The purpose of the Qualifier Exam (QE) is to test the fundamental knowledge acquired by the student over prior coursework and assess the ability to apply this fundamental knowledge to approach research questions/problems.

• The student must take the qualifier exam within the first 3 semesters of their entrance into the doctoral program. If taken in the Fall semester, the exam must be administered by mid-November and by mid-April in the Spring semester. If the student fails, then an advisor-led appeal may be submitted to the QESC and if approved, must be scheduled for a date within the following semester of the failed attempt. If the appeal is not approved, then the student fails and is no longer in the PhD program.

If the appeal is granted, the QE committee remains the same for the second attempt. If the advisor changes between the first and second attempts (if appeal is approved), the two other committee members remain the same. If a student fails the second time (if appeal is granted) the student is no longer in the PhD program. 

If the student does not take the QE during the semester he/she is required to take it, this will be considered a failed attempt. Any extenuating circumstances may be brought up to the QESC by the advisor. 

Qualifier Exam Format: 


The exam will be 90 minutes long. The student will be asked to give a short presentation (20-30 minutes) on a research topic chosen by the advisor and the student. This research topic should be submitted to the QESC within the first semester of the student’s entrance into the program to make sure that the student progress is on a timeline.  The presentation will be a literature survey of the particular topic based on recent (<5 years) high impact publications. It cannot be a conference paper submitted by the student AND it cannot have any author other than the student taking the exam.

The presentation will be followed by questioning by each member (including advisor) on: (a) directly about the research topic presented (as would be typical at a conference), and (b) in the general area of the research topic (to test the student's grasp of the problem area) and will be on fundamentals testing the student's ability to integrate the material learned in the courses they took, the ability to apply their knowledge to solve research problems; and these questions do not have to be associated with the presentation. The student will supply 3 undergraduate courses most aligned with their research topic they are presenting when they submit their QE registration form.

It is expected that the student answers the questions on their own without the assistance of the advisor. The advisor should not assist the student in preparation of the presentation and the paper (see below)


At least one week prior to the oral presentation, the student will provide a four-page two-column document, in the standard format for conferences in their area, to all committee members. This work will be solely the work of the student and the student should be the only author. It is important that  the student does not plagiarize (plagiarizing can be defined as "taking the work or an idea of someone else and passing it off as one's own"). If there are any questions on this, please consult your advisor or the doctoral coordinator. 

This write-up will be a written version of the oral presentation. The student will also provide a copy of this document to the ECE Qual Exam Subcommittee ahead of the exam date. The quality of the written component is expected to be ready for submission and should be clear, well organized, and free of spelling and grammar errors. The advisor should not assist the student in preparation of the paper - it should be independent work. The paper cannot be a conference paper or journal publication the student has prepared and there should only be ONE author (the student who is taking the qualifying exam).

iii. RESULTS: 

When the committee is finished asking questions, the committee members will meet in closed session to discuss and vote on whether the student passed the oral exam. During the exam, there will be a form filled out by the committee members which will be used to discuss the results of the exam. The student is considered to have passed the oral exam with a unanimous vote from the committee.  

If the decision is not unanimous, then the following procedure will be followed:

i. The person or persons who do not agree with the decision to pass the student will write a detailed reason for why they believe they do not agree and present to the QE Subcommittee. The QESC will then make a decision.
ii. If a unanimous vote is not obtained as a result of the QESC decision, and the student is deemed to fail the exam, then advisor can appeal for a second chance as written above. 

CANDIDACYCandidacy Requirements

  1. Thesis Proposal and Oral Exam - Having passed the qualifying examination, a student may submit his/her dissertation proposal and defend the proposal before the Doctoral Committee (minimum of 3 members, including the Thesis Advisor). The proposal examination will also include an oral examination on topics connected with the student’s area of research. It is highly recommended that there is a minimum of 6 months between the proposal defense and the PhD final defense. On passing this examination, the student’s name will be submitted to the College Doctoral Committee and the Registrar's Office for acceptance as a candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree. Admission to candidacy status does not guarantee the obtaining of the degree.
  2. Final Defense of Dissertation  - This is the final oral examination, conducted by the Doctoral Committee. The membership of the committee may be augmented by non-voting faculty. The candidate has to submit a written Dissertation based on the research during the period of the Ph.D. degree. After receiving the approval of the advisor and the Doctoral Committee, the final oral examination shall be conducted. In order to pass, the candidate may not receive more than one dissenting vote from the membership of the examination committee.

At least two weeks (14 days) prior to the date of the presentation of the dissertation proposal AND the final defense, an announcement document must be submitted to the Associate Chair for the Doctoral Program and the Associate Dean of Graduate Studies in the College of Engineering. After the committee members and the posting is approved by the Associate Dean for Graduate studies, posting will be forwarded to the UML News by the Dean’s Office. The template for posting thesis and dissertation announcement can be found at defense announcement template.

The dissertation proposal is open to the public. The proposal will outline the motivation for the research, give a summary of the related past work in the area and present the scope of the proposed dissertation research. The proposal should clearly articulate the proposed contribution of the student to the knowledge base and how it differs from the past work. The examinee will be expected to answer questions from the audience to demonstrate his/her understanding of the proposed research, as well as his/her proficiency in the general research field related to the dissertation proposal. The dissertation committee may require the candidate to retake the proposal defense after additional work.

The final defense entails a PhD student defending their doctoral dissertation and is expected to utilize the same committee that was put together by the advisor for the dissertation proposal defense. Any changes to the committee must be approved by the Associate Chair for the Doctoral Program. Upon a successful presentation and submission of a high quality doctoral dissertation students will become eligible to graduate if they have completed all of the required credits (course, dissertation and seminar credits). Student must file a Declaration of Intent to Graduate Form (pdf) (aka DIG form) with the Registrar's Office. Deadlines can be found on the University’s Academic Calendar. The Registrar's Office will verify course credit, grade and GPA requirements, and submission of dissertation prior to the awarding the degree.

 Academic Requirements

1. Credit Requirement

The Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree requires completion of a minimum of 63 semester hours of academic credit beyond the Bachelor of Science degree. A typical program consists of the following:

  • A minimum of 30 approved credit hours of graduate-level engineering courses (10 courses), including associated science and math courses.
  • A minimum of 21 credit hours of doctoral dissertation.
  • The balance of the remaining 12 credits can be a mix of graduate-level engineering courses including associated science and math coursework and dissertation credits at the discretion of the department, faculty advisor and dissertation committee.

2. Core Requirement

The core courses are beginning graduate courses. They emphasize the fundamentals, concepts, and analytical techniques relevant to Electrical/Computer Engineering. They also help the student prepare for the qualifying examination.

Required Core Courses for Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering: (choose three courses)

Students in Electrical Engineering must take three courses of the above courses.

Required Core Courses for Ph.D. degree in Computer Engineering: 

3. Grade-Point Average (GPA) Requirement

To successfully complete the program, a student must achieve a cumulative grade-point average (GPA) of at least 3.25 in all course work.

Sat, 23 Jan 2016 11:00:00 -0600 en text/html

090-554 information search | 090-554 information source | 090-554 history | 090-554 exam | 090-554 study tips | 090-554 test | 090-554 study help | 090-554 Exam plan | 090-554 information search | 090-554 Exam plan |

Killexams Exam Simulator
Killexams Questions and Answers
Killexams Exams List
Search Exams
090-554 Practice Test Download
Practice Exams List